Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mono Black Demons | kazutaka oya | 11-3 | None |
| Abzan Beanstalk | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 28, 2025 |
| Mono Black Demons | strongmind | 6-1 | None |
| Esper Pixie | junpei nakamura | 8-4 | None |
| Mono Black Demons | molly1008 | 8-4 | None |
| yusuke kanazawa | 6-2 | None | |
| Orzhov Pixie | drew martin | 6-2 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | vtec16s | 6-2 | None |
| Esper Pixie | dr4gun0v | 6-8 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | shintarou yoshida | 6-6 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Pixie , Abzan Roots , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Midrange , Dimir Oculus , Dimir Reanimator , Domain Zur Overlords
Meta Performance Analysis
Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth ranks #5085 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 99%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 45.6%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 13.23 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.0%. Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth has a win rate of 57.9%, making it 23.2% better than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Path of Peril | Sorcery | 5 | 83.3% | 3 |
| Invoke Despair | Sorcery | 8 | 65.7% | 2 |
| Warping Wail | Instant | 5 | 64.6% | 1 |
| Bloodchief's Thirst | Sorcery | 9 | 64.3% | 3 |
| Dark Petition | Sorcery | 6 | 64.0% | 2 |
| Wurmcoil Engine | Artifact Creature — Phyrexian Wurm | 5 | 63.6% | 2 |
| Extinction Event | Sorcery | 9 | 62.3% | 2 |
| Emrakul, the Promised End | Legendary Creature — Eldrazi | 6 | 61.3% | 2 |
| Nissa, Worldwaker | Legendary Planeswalker — Nissa | 6 | 61.3% | 2 |
| Tormod's Crypt | Artifact | 5 | 61.1% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Go Blank | Sorcery | 3 | 5 | 73.9% | 56.9% | +17.0% |
| Legion's End | Sorcery | 2 | 5 | 71.4% | 56.3% | +15.1% |
| Thought-Knot Seer | Creature — Eldrazi | 4 | 6 | 69.6% | 54.8% | +14.8% |
| Warping Wail | Instant | 2 | 5 | 75.0% | 60.8% | +14.2% |
| Emrakul, the Promised End | Legendary Creature — Eldrazi | 13 | 5 | 76.2% | 62.3% | +13.9% |
| Reality Smasher | Creature — Eldrazi | 5 | 6 | 69.6% | 55.9% | +13.7% |
| Heartless Act | Instant | 2 | 6 | 72.5% | 58.9% | +13.6% |
| Arcane Signet | Artifact | 2 | 6 | 71.4% | 57.8% | +13.6% |
| Matter Reshaper | Creature — Eldrazi | 3 | 5 | 69.6% | 57.0% | +12.5% |
| All Is Dust | Kindred Sorcery — Eldrazi | 7 | 5 | 69.6% | 57.7% | +11.9% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mono Black Demons | 30 | 15.7% | 54.9% |
| Esper Pixie | 27 | 1.4% | 34.5% |
| Orzhov Pixie | 18 | 7.2% | 31.2% |
| Dimir Midrange | 12 | 0.5% | 50.8% |
| Golgari Midrange | 11 | 1.3% | 50.2% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.